A Nigerian law student has stirred reactions online after sharing a video in which she discussed the legal rights of individuals under the age of 21.

The clip, posted on X (formerly Twitter) by AskyGRN, features the young woman, identified as Barrister Amida, offering what she described as a lesson on contract law — delivered in a humorous yet controversial tone.

“You Don’t Know Your Rights”

In the video, she argued that many young Nigerians are unaware of certain legal protections available to them.

According to her explanation, anyone under the age of 21 is considered an “infant” under the law and may not be fully bound by contractual obligations. She stated that minors are generally not liable under contracts, except in cases involving necessities such as food, and even then, liability may be limited.

Advice on Borrowing and Repayment

Taking her argument further, she suggested that individuals under 21 who borrow money may not be legally compelled to repay it because they lack the legal capacity to enter into binding contracts.

In her words:

“One thing about you guys in this country is that you don’t know your rights. Now I’m going to teach you another one. If you are not up to 21, you are an infant under the law.

If you go somewhere to eat and say you’re not liable to pay because you’re under 21, they might beat you — but according to the law, you’re not meant to pay. Though because food is a necessity, you may have limited liability.

If the food costs ₦50,000 and you only have ₦1,000, they have to collect it because you are just an infant. You may think I’m joking, but I’m actually revising for my exam.

And if you borrow ₦500,000, the person cannot sue you. You’re not even liable to refund it because you don’t have the capacity to enter a contract. So go and borrow plenty money before you turn 21. When they say they’ll take you to court, tell them you’re not liable.

But if they’re about to beat you, don’t say Amida gave you the advice. I’m just teaching you law.”

While many viewers interpreted her remarks as satire or exam revision banter, others raised concerns that such statements could mislead young people about their legal responsibilities.

The video has since generated debate online, with users discussing the nuances of contract law and whether her interpretation was accurate or oversimplified.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *