The ongoing drama between crypto entrepreneur Blord and social media critic VeryDarkMan has taken a fresh twist — and this time, it’s coming straight from the legal camp.

In a surprising development, Blord’s lawyer has come forward with statements that are already stirring conversations online, especially over the controversial ‘Ratel’ trademark claim.

“I Don’t Even Know Him” — Lawyer Distances Himself

Speaking on the matter, the legal counsel made it clear that he has no personal relationship with Blord, a statement that has raised eyebrows considering the ongoing case.

“I don’t know him from anywhere,” he said.

The revelation alone has left many wondering about the dynamics behind the legal representation.

Ratel Trademark Claim? “It Was Just to Trigger VDM”

In what many are calling the biggest shocker, the lawyer revealed that Blord’s earlier claim of trademarking “Ratel” may not have been entirely factual.

According to him, the statement was allegedly made just to provoke VeryDarkMan during their online clash.

That admission has now added a whole new layer to the already messy feud.

From Online Drama to Courtroom Battle

The lawyer further emphasized that the entire issue started as a social media disagreement and should never have escalated to the level of legal action.

Still, things took a serious turn after accusations surfaced that Blord used VeryDarkMan’s identity and image without consent.

“I Won’t Be Intimidated”

Addressing the tension, the lawyer didn’t hold back, accusing VeryDarkMan of trying to intimidate parties involved.

“He has some good records, but trying to match anybody like this is wrong,” he said.

He also made it clear that he would not be pressured or intimidated despite the online noise.

Blord Still in Custody

Recall that Blord was remanded at the Kuje Correctional Centre earlier this month following the allegations.

As it stands, the case continues to unfold, with new revelations keeping the public hooked.

At this point, what started as online dragging has fully turned into a legal war — and with statements like this coming out, it’s clear the drama is far from over.

One question remains:

Was the “Ratel” claim really just cruise… or is there more to the story? 🤔

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *